Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never
Let Me Go is an outstanding novel about a dystopia where clones are raised
to become organ donors. As we were reading this novel, I was constantly
reminded about George Orwell’s 1984.
I noticed similarities primarily in the settings of the two novels since the
environments were extremely important in the develop of the characters in both
novels.
George Orwell’s 1984 is set in a world where there are only three large nations left
that are all isolated from each other and where there is always a war raging
between two out of three of the nations. Readers follow Winston, a member of
the nation of Oceania, as he starts to question the society and consider
rebelling. The majority of the population of Oceania, known as the Outer
Party, is governed by the Party and they are taught to obey and love Big
Brother, their ruler. The people in this society are constantly, and rather
creepily, under surveillance and the “history” of this world is constantly
being altered by the government. People have to accept what the Party tells
them is the past because they have no concrete evidence to prove otherwise. Although
the students in Never Let Me Go did
not seem to have as many strict rules they had to abide by, the students started
out in an isolated world where their main sources of information were authoritative
figures and this is may be why they cannot bring themselves to rebel or run
away from their assigned fates.
The Party is able to brainwash most of the population to
“love” the Party and Big Brother by manipulating documented history to create a
situation where this love becomes almost instinctual. Memories are unreliable
because they can be twisted, changed, lost over time. It’s even possible that
some memories are just figments of your imagination. Ways that people usually
use to confirm that their memories are true are through confirmation with
either somebody that shares the same memory or finding some source of physical
evidence. Neither is available to the Outer Party members because of the
Party’s prevention of them from communicating with one another and their
tampering with all documented history. Because of this, people such as Winston
become doubtful of their sanity because they fear that their memories might
just be figments of their imaginations. Most people will readily accept
whatever the Party tells them happened in the past rather than go insane from
trying to figure out whether they are insane or not. In other words, humans
like to stay in a comfort zone that consists of what they have been taught and
what they have experienced throughout their lives.
While Winston did make a failed attempt to rebel against his
society, Kathy and other students did little to try to escape their fates. Winston
had at least some experiences from before his society became a dystopia. This
is probably the reason why the severe isolation of individuals in his society was
slightly less effective at brainwashing him and he was slightly less hindered
to try to escape his comfort zone. It’s a shame that Winston still ended up
being brainwashed even further in the end and started simply accepting his fate
as it was dictated by the society. A likely reason that Kathy and other
students chose to accept their destinies may be because they rather stay in
their comfort zones that they have developed through years of being raised as
donors. Beating somebody is not an effective way of making them obedient. Punishments
for crimes and wrongdoings have been shown to be very limited to convincing a
person to not to do something again. Even though it was not their intention, the
guardians at Hailsham were very effective at teaching their students that it is
natural and right for them to be organ donors by essentially making donations a
central part of their education. This is especially obvious when we take a look
at Tommy. As mentioned in class, Tommy even seems to find a little bit of dignity
in being a good donor.
Although the environment of 1984 is like a severe version of Hailsham, It was interesting to see
how the isolation factors in both 1984
and Never Let Me Go affected the
characters. I am still shocked that Kathy and Tommy didn’t try to escape or
rebel in any way after their conversation with Madame and Miss Emily though. Even
so, I see that this could be Ishiguro’s way of telling us several things.
Ishiguro might be suggesting that we question the information we receive more,
that we should not place as many limitations on ourselves, and that we should try
to step out of our comfort zones at times.
I really enjoyed your post: dystopian novels! I thought all of your comparisons are relevant and interesting, 1984 was an excellent choice! Your mention on memory in terms of 1984 made me think about the important role of memory in NLMG... essentially it is all that Kathy has after she can no longer find Hailsham, has lost Tommy and Ruth and is preparing to start her own donations. I think this theme of memory could be an important element, in societies where people don't tangibly have freedom to own themselves or their actions, could it be that all they have is their memories?
ReplyDeleteThe memories in 1984 and NLMG also remind me of "The Matrix." While people are in the matrix, their memories are controlled by machines; they aren't real. Winston and Kathy both question the validity of their memories as well.
ReplyDeleteGreat comparison. I have read 1984 and know that you pointed out it was very similar to Never Let Me Go. They are both similar in the way that no one from the clones questions what is going on around them. They characters in both of these book just live their lives as it is planned out for them and don't think about anything. They minds are constantly influenced from their birth and most of the kids just simply don't know what is right and what is wrong.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me like in 1984, Hailsham would be like a country rather than a school. I think brainwashing in 1984 would be like teaching the students certain ideas in Hailsham because the students all had a certain perspective on their world which is influenced by the guardians. In that way, it is similar to manipulating history...
ReplyDeleteI agree with you about the ending. I wish Kathy and Tommy tried to escape. I felt like nothing is stopping them beside their attachment toward Hailsham and the ideas that they were taught. I do not understand why they did not just break the rule after arriving in cottage because no one can stop them from what they want to do. Maybe what you say is right about people should try to step out of their comfort zone?